Decode.
50+ attributes, tagged per ad.
Hook, cast, pacing, CTA.
50+ attributes, tagged per ad.
Hook, cast, pacing, CTA.
Why the ad worked.
And why it didn’t.
$31 CAC
CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost)
Dermatologist$18
Daily user$31
Builds the next ad
from the winning formula.
Raw ads in
Everything the account has ever run
Brand memory
Daily Glow · 411 ads remembered
Built by Vira
Decoded, scripted, shipped — every two weeks.
Your brand. Our desk.
Galvor runs the loop — your team keeps the brand and the final yes. Every 14 days. Nothing shipped without a reason.
Trusted by leading D2C brands










Why now
Advantage+ and Performance Max took the media decisions off your desk. Bidding, placement, audience — the machine does it. Creative is the last lever you still control, and it’s the one nobody has data on.
Decode
Top three hooks
Top three narratives
Top three creator types
Module 01
Where to put the next dollar. And where to stop.
Ordered by money at stake · 32 of 11
ScaleProblem-statement
Put more budget behind problem-statement opens. 18% cheaper per order than your average, on 91 creatives.
$184Kif you scale it
CutProduct late in frame
Pull budget out of cuts that hold the product back past 10s. 46% dearer than your average, on 38.
$112Kfreed if you cut
ShiftStudio → at home
Move budget from studio-lit sets into routines shot at home. Same creators, 1.4× the hold.
$94Kmoved, not added
Module 02
Not concepts. Timecoded scripts your creators can shoot tomorrow.
Built from what held · 21 of 4

Dull by lunch
Problem-statement hook · held in 7 of your 9 strongest

Read the label
Routine shot at home · 1.4× the hold of studio sets
Module 03
Finished ads, not mood boards. On brand, ready to ship.



Generated from the winning formula · 3 of 9
Problem Statement×Product in Hand×Explicit CTA
Module 04
Ask in plain English. It answers from your evidence and hands back the work.
Answered from your evidence · 3 sources
Make a Campaign Brief to target Aspirational Users
Brand memory Aspirational buyers respond to your problem-statement hook and product-in-hand shots — the pattern behind your 7 strongest creatives.
Your question Brief targets Aspirational Users: lead with status and self-image, not price.
Industry data Competitors reaching this segment lean on before/after narratives and founder-led explainers — both gaps in your current library.
Your creatives, briefs and feedback, connected. So every next ad starts with what your brand has already learned.


The Desk
We price the attribute, not the ad.
Not more creative — the same loop, operated on your account every fortnight, with the evidence trail intact.
01 Decode
31 ads read
02 Prove
Every attribute priced
03 Scripts
9 written, timecoded
04 Cuts
9 made, on brand
05 Shipped
2 live this cycle
Day 1Nothing ships without a reason attachedDay 14
02 / Who does what
Galvor operates
We run the loop.
Every 14 days, on your account
You decide
You hold the yes.
Nothing goes live without your sign-off
The brief is the one thing neither of us does alone — your context, our evidence. Your agency stays if you want it: hand them the scripts and the evidence, and they shoot.
Why it holds
Does the score change because we made it?
No.
Same 50+ attributes. Same thresholds. Published method. Hand any brief to your own team or your agency and the decode reads it identically.
We’d rather be right than be hired.
It stays with you, and that is exactly what makes the recommendation worth trusting.
Galvor stays sellable as software on its own — the service is the part you can take or leave.
The co-worker
A digital co-worker on your creative team — and it shows its thinking.
Proof
How brands that live on paid creative use Galvor — in their own words, with their own numbers.

Fashion — menswear
Premium linen & cotton D2C brand
“By month 3, it was predicting which archetype would land before we even wrote the brief.”

Beauty — skincare
Clean skincare & serum D2C brand
“I typed exactly what I needed and got a shortlist that actually matched.”

Wellness — supplements
Ayurvedic supplements D2C brand
“The model identified it immediately. Reallocation paid back in campaign one.”
Galvor vs. the alternatives
All four alternatives, one table.
| Capability | Galvor | Gen tools | Reporting tools | Creator platforms | Agencies |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decode reads | |||||
| Why a creative worked | Yes | No | Tags, not priced | No | Opinion |
| Each attribute priced to CPO & CAC | Yes | No | Impressions only | No | No |
| Yours and the category, one view | Yes | No | Your account only | No | Ad-hoc |
| Brand Memory keeps | |||||
| Findings re-tested before trusted | Yes | No | Campaign level | No | No |
| Sharper every campaign | Yes | No | No | No | Leaves with the team |
| Create does | |||||
| Does the work, shows the evidence | Yes | Generates blind | Evidence, no action | No | No trail |
| Creator discovery, vetting, video QC | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Proved cuts in regional languages | Yes | A few languages | No | No | Re-shoot |
| Run does | |||||
| The loop operated, not advised | Yes | No | No | No | Yes, no trail |
| Every shipped asset traced to a number | Yes | No | Reports only | No | Rarely |
| Your team keeps brand and approval | Yes | n/a | n/a | No | Varies |
Security & data
What we read, where it lives, and who can see it.
Full detail in our privacy policy.
Questions
Thanks. We’ll be in touch.